I'm Seth Shostak, Senior Astronomer at the SETI Institute AMA.

What are the chances of aliens living in our galaxy? and based on our current knowledge of Physics, do you think is it possible for a human/alien to ever travel to another galaxy?

Our galaxy has roughly a trillion planets. Hard to imagine that they're ALL sterile.

Traveling between galaxies is hard ... typical distances are millions of light-years. That's a trip that, even with our fastest rockets, would take longer than the current age of the universe. That's a long time to be sitting in the middle seat ...

Can you give us an idea of how many of these trillion planets are perhaps suitable for life, and how much do we know about them?

We know nothing about the overwhelming majority, but NASA's Kepler telescope will tell us what fraction are habitable ... and it's not unreasonable to assume that the fraction will be somewhere between one in a thousand and one in ten. Even with the pessimistic number, that's still a billion habitable worlds ... just in OUR galaxy.

Why do most aliens land in the US?

I think this is an EXCELLENT question! It could be the superior fast food in this country. Mainly, however, it's likely to be the fact that one-third of the American populace believes that aliens are visiting ... and hey, if they're here, they're not going to be spending all their time in Lower Moldavia.

For the Bunny Ranch

Bunny ranch? Is that a kind of salad dressing?

Legal Brothel.

Glad to hear it's legal.

How can I get a job with you guys? I'll do anything.

Well, the real problem is ... lack of money! We're not hiring too many folks these days ... which is a real shame.

I want a job there too. Any extremophile biologists need an assistant?

Hey, if you're in school, apply to NASA's REU program. If not ... well, write an astrobiologist.

If you detect an anomaly of some sort, how do you determine whether it's an alien signal, or something more mundane like a human satellite or computer error?

And thanks for the AMA :)

Good question. First, we look at some of the signal characteristics to see if it's just a transmitter bolted to the Earth, in which case we can throw it out. But the real test is to move the antennas around a bit, and establish that the signal's coming from one spot on the sky, that moves across the sky at the same rate as the stars.

Is lack of funding a huge problem? Are you concerned for the future or are their new opportunities and advancements to look forward to?

Huge. There may not be enough money for me to finish this sen

How far away could aliens detect our radio signals if they had the same technology that we have today?

Not very far. In fact, not even the distance of the nearest star for many signals (such as TV). But our radars ARE very powerful, and could be found with technology analogous to ours from tens or hundreds of light-years distance.

What kind of procedures are in place if contact is made? What steps take place once you can verify that the source of a signal is not terrestrial? Also, are you allowed to just run around screaming you found life, or does Uncle Sam put a lock down on it?

No lock down. We KNOW this from false alarms. We do every test we can think of to determine if a signal's extraterrestrial ... including calling up someone at a different radio telescope, and asking THEM to confirm the detection.

Moon-base?

Could be, but habitats in orbit might be easier to build and supply.

Been having your book on my amazon wishlist for a long time now. Now i'll finally buy it! Thank you for your work and being here!

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

I want to thank you for inspiring me to go back to school; it was AWA/BPS that reminded me that if you do something you enjoy, you will never have to work a day in your life.

As for questions: 1. I've heard of using spectroscopy to determine elements in clouds of stuff out in space; would it be possible to see atmospheres on planets, and if so could one determine if there were strange chemical processes going on? 2. How much do you like your day job? As in, do you find astronomy and science communication rewarding? 3. You talk a lot about sci-fi flicks from yesteryear, do you have any favorite sci-fi books or short stories?

Thanks again.

Terrific ... a listener to "Big Picture Science". Yes, spectroscopy HAS been used to look at the atmospheres of a few planets. With a space-based telescope, you could find things like oxygen and methane ... and find pigs in space! My day job's great. Except that it often extends into the evenings! And I'm painfully ignorant of written sci-fi. I know only about the really cheesy sci-fi flicks!

I'll let the more scientifically inclined redditors keep asking the interesting questions. What I really want to know is what kind of snack/beverage you prefer to consume during countless hours of data analysis and signal observation.

What kind? The unhealthy kind, that's what! But actually, all the tedious stuff has been automated.

I will admit that the Institute recently installed some vending machines a 30 second walk from my office. I wonder if they have Corn Nuts?

Do you think its possible that we might see some odd astronomical sighting that would prove there was ETI?

I do! It may be that we find our first evidence of ET by the accidental discovery of some mammoth astroengineering.

Have you guys ever considered making a little housetop dish+sensor that people could buy, install, and connect to the internet as a remote receiver that you'd control as part of a large grid? (It could include some "profit" in the purchase price to help fund the system, and perhaps be linked to an on-going pledge.)

Harder to do than you think ... in particular, you need the high spectral resolution receiver behind the whole thing. The dish is actually the cheapest part of the operation ...

Any thoughts about how the religious leaders might react to a true ETI signal? ie how would the Catholics, Muslims and nutty right wing Christians react?

Texas would probably not allow it in their textbooks...

Mainstream theologians would not be dismayed by this. Fundamentalists would have a harder time ... because descriptions of aliens are not found in scripture.

Can't speak to the reaction of Texas. Oklahoma, on the other hand ...

How often do you guys get all excited from signals such as the "wow" signal? Do ever prank each other with such things? I'm guessing trolling happens daily.

Also, I always had a question about the SETI @home project: how much error correction or error checking was done? If I recall, I was on dial up whe. I ran the screensaver. If my computer downloaded authentic alien data from you guys, then never reconnected to upload the findings, is t possible that I royally screwed up our only chance of being contacted? (or was the same data sent to multiple users)

Thanks bro.

SETI@home's not our project. It's run by the guys at the Univ. of Calif. at Berkeley.

Exciting signals? Once every few years. Not much pranking, I'm afraid ... Too bad, as it would probably be educational!

Wow.

That's a signal comment!

Do we really want to contact an alien civilsation? What I'm getting at is, if you look at how our own western civilisation has dealt with other societies in the past, how can we be sure that we won't be conquered by a more advanced civilisation soon after forst contact?

No one knows if they'd be white hats or black hats. But whether we want to or not, evidence of our presence is now flying out into space. Not just our inadvertent transmissions like TV and radar, but things like the light from our cities. My advice? Don't lose sleep.

How ridiculous do you find the Planet X/Nibiru "theories" that are floating around the Web?

I wouldn't give this any credit. If Nibiru existed, we would both see it and know its orbit ... not to mention being aware of the disruption of orbits in our solar system. But those disruptions are not there.

Hi Seth! Big fan of you and SETI. Thanks a lot for all your hard work!

My question gravitates around Kepler. How has Kepler changed SETI? Has it had a huge impact on your strategy for finding E.T.?

Well, obviously we look at the Kepler candidate planet systems. I think the big impact will be when Kepler finally tells us what fraction of stars have habitable planets. If that's a reasonable fraction (more than one in a thousand), then we can just look at almost all stars with confidence.

What do are your thoughts on the nature of potential contactees/extraterrestrials? Do you think they would really want to? Might they use a technology advanced beyond the use of radiowaves? Is SETI is more geared towards accidental contact?

All of this depends on some things we don't know, such as (1) the motivations of aliens, and (2) their technical level. But I would bet on a deliberate signal ... easier to find.

I see! Thanks! I guess I will just hope that if they are sufficiently advanced enough to contact US, they would also be advanced enough to have no interest in killing us all for our resources.... Unless you have reason to believe otherwise?!?

Hey, we don't have any resources THEY don't have ... other than our culture. Maybe they'd come here for the reggae ...

Maybe an obvious question, but what's the juiciest find you know of? The thing that you really can't explain?

I know this is disappointing ... but all the signals we find these days are checked out, and quickly discarded as terrestrial interference. In the old days of SETI, we'd record data ... and look at it later. That's when you would find things like the "Wow" signal -- which we couldn't check out very easily. But probably all those early "unexplained" signals were interference too.

You have simultaneously crushed by spirits with your response but raised them with its promptness, professionalism, and clarity. I am confused, but thank you. I think.

Professional and clear, but now you're confused? Guess it wasn't either professional or clear!

Do you ever wonder if somehow upper management was deliberately obfuscating real alien communication (like introducing bugs into pattern recognition algorithms so that they are mislabeled "terrestrial interference?")

Let me assure you, they have neither the incentive nor the technical ability to do this!

How long until Gary has his own comedy show?

You'll have to talk to Gary about this!

Gary, please do an AMA!

I'll pass your request on to him!

So, when can we expect space colonies?

In the 1970s, it was predicted that tens of millions of people would be living in orbiting space colonies by the 1990s. Didn't happen. I figure towards the end of this century.

How often do you wake up hoping that it's finally the day you start to live out the plot of The Arrival?

Not often! If you do that, you'll be destroyed by dashed hopes.

What it is the best way an average joe can promote the SETI Institute.

Tell your friends. Or maybe, if you're a skywriter, you could write the name of the organization in the skies above, say, New York!

[deleted]

Can't imagine.

Do you ever lay awake at night wondering if the evolutionary history of Earth was necessary for intelligence? If the evolutionary history was necessary, then it seems highly unlikely that it exists elsewhere given the immense variation of paths life can take.

So the philosophy of SETI is rooted in the notion that intelligence is convergent, an idea that I find persuasive... but not absolutely convincing until we have a second data point! Does that ever keep you up at night?

Edit: BTW I'm a huge SETI fan, even made this video for you guys. Keep it up!

Doesn't keep me up at night. Spicy food might. Yes, there are many paths evolution could take ... but hey, intelligence has survival value, so I figure it might occur in many places.

But one could argue that 2 hands and 2 feet (quadrupedalism), 10 fingers and toes, or even certain patterns of bird plumage have survival value. And yet of course we don't expect to see peacock feathers on alien worlds. In order for us to believe that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the cosmos, we have to believe that it has universal survival value and that the evolutionary road to get there is convergent.

Like I said, in all likelihood I think intelligent life exists elsewhere, but a small portion of me sees merit in arguments that say it's an Earthly anecdote like peacock feathers. And that small portion... keeps me up at night. Thanks for the answers and good luck :)

The pessimistic point of view might be right, but we'll never settle this argument sitting around in bars, swigging beers. Need to do the experiment ... Right?

Oh, and liked the video.

Love that you're doing this. Some random questions:

• I remember reading somewhere about using the sun as a gravitational lense, putting a telescope way out near the sun and thus being to resolve objects with incredible resolution(like trees, vegetation on exoplanets). How doable is this currently besides the prohibitive distance?

• Alpha Centauri, any updates on detected exoplanets there?

• What is next after Kepler? It's a real shame there is not something like the TPF. We've got our priorities out of wack I say.

Using the Sun as a gravitational lens works on paper ... but involves sending spacecraft to a distance 100 times farther than we've ever done. Maybe by the end of this century?

Agree about the TPF ... they say to write your congressman, but I'm not sure that's so efficacious these days.

How many Earth like planets are close enough to our planet for their incidental radio wave transmissions to reach us? Stated the other way, how many "capable of supporting intelligent life" planets are close enough to Earth to be able to hear the radio wave broadcasts we are transmitting?

We don't know this. But let's say that one in a thousand stars has an Earth-like planet (maybe not a bad guess ...) Then within 70 light-years (we've been broadcasting TV for 70 years) there are roughly 10 such planets.

What's a typical day at work like? Any plans to join Fraiser Cain and Dr. Pamela Gay during one of their weekly hangouts?

I've been on Pamela Gay's podcast once. But do check out BigPictureScience.org You might find it interesting.

What is your best guess about the 'wow' signal ?

It wasn't found when a follow-up observation was made about one minute later. Best guess is that it was terrestrial interference.

The ATA has started looking at Kepler planets for artificial radio signals. Given that the majority of Kepler planets are thousands of light years from Earth, how powerful would a radio transmission have to be to be detected by the ATA in its current 42 dish configuration?

Good question, and I haven't actually worked the numbers carefully, but roughly this would require a transmitter power of 10 Megawatts or so if they have a transmitting antenna 1000 feet across (same as the Arecibo antenna in Puerto Rico)

Wow. That's actually not as bad as I thought it might be. Wikipedia says Arecibo is capable of much more than that, so maybe you guys will find something after all. Good luck.

BTW, I read "Confessions of an Alien Hunter" and I loved it. Thanks.

Thanks for the kind book review! I thank you. So does my Mom.

Not much of a point then?

Wouldn't say that. We build megawatt transmitters. Why couldn't your average, technically inclined Klingon?

What do you think of the Fermi Paradox?

It's puzzling and paradoxical! But really, I wouldn't draw too many conclusions from a "local observation" about non-local truths.

As a kid I enjoyed "playing" with the Drake equation. Recently I stumbled across Susan Blackmore's revised version of the equation. Here (starting at 13:30) she talks about it. She says it's more about replicators than "intelligence". Do you agree?

I'm not sure I follow what she REALLY means, but hey ... Look, what's important is the number of places where something (replicator, life form, AI machine, or anything else you like) is able to build a radio transmitter. That's all.

Any chance we can make the system distributed like galaxy quest, einstein@home and some of the other searching systems? Even if we have to start an open source project?

We do have SETIlive, so check that out at SETIlive.org The difficulty with all these programs is user support!

i'll give it a go, anything to contribute :)

p.s. i'm a software/hardware dev, if theres anything else, let me know :D

OK. Let me know if you find it worthwhile or otherwise.

Don't you think that the chances of an alien civilization transmitting radio waves is VERY low? I mean, what are the chances of an alien civilization have thrilled the same technological path as our civilization at all? Would they necessarily have to communicate via radio?

On the basis of the physics we know, it's a very inexpensive way to send bits of info from one place to another.

How can us ordinary citizen folk muster up interest in the public so that people are once again interested in exploring the cosmos?

Good question, and I wish there were a straightforward, obvious-as-Bergerac's-nose answer. Better science education would help. But that's easy to say.

how big of a transmitter/receiver would we need in order to pick up a signal from andromeda galaxy?

One that ws about 10,000 times larger in area than necessary to find the same signal from a planet around the nearest stars. So roughly twenty miles across!

What is your daily routine like?

These days ... mostly answering e-mail! Remember: the data analysis is done real time at the observatory. I don't sit here with headphones.

Some telescope observation that could only be caused by an ET? - It would have to be very BIG I guess...

Dyson sphere building or a supernova being used as a local BBQ or some such.....

If anybody could ever prove anything about String Theory could this be useful to SETI?

Not sure how string theory could help, but of course I might have said the same thing about quantum mechanics a long time ago ... and it helps.

Like the idea of a supernova barbeque. Tasty, crispy critters.

Did you expect that we would have heard something from an alien civilization by now?

No. We've barely scratched the surface ... only looked carefully at about 1,000 star systems. Fortunately, the search is speeding up!

How far back do you think Proxmire in 78 and Congress in the 80/90s put back SETI?

Where would we be today if the money had been spent back then?

Thanks

No one can say. Proxmire only killed NASA SETI for a year, but the Bryan Senate amendment in 1993 killed it forever (or at least, until now). We'd have more and better experiments by now. And faster ones, too.

what novels do you read while the computers grind away at the data? and what would you say to 10 year old interested in science?

I read the current month's selection of my book club.

To the 10 year old, I would answer questions and buy them an occasional book.

[deleted]

Well, again, we do take a few student interns each summer ... mostly via NASA's REU program (check it out). It's a small number, alas.

Multiple universes seem to make sense from the point of view of physics. Not clear we can ever prove their existence, though.