FourFingeredMartian

There is always "suicide".

Edit: Could just end up being 'collateral damage' in the first domestic drone strike to stop a "known terrorist". How far off are we from this horrific possibility? Hell, they already killed a US Citizen in another country without as much as a warrant, or trial...

Better question: Since you did give us many great Sunday mornings, Saturday nights watching Ren & Stimpy...

What do we have to do in order to get your show GEORGE LIQUOR SHOW on the air? *Who do we have to call & email?

Then the entire world can band together & put up a fighting force. There is zero reason why America needs to be the leader on this operation, or even provide any of the firepower -- after all, the world supports a war, let the world wage it.

Sounds like you don't even know how the basics of NAT, let alone the larger topic Binney is actually getting at, which, is BGP.

What you fail to realize is the system he created vs the system that put into its place. Both systems sucked up all the data it could possibly get their hands on, the distinct difference (my understanding based on descriptions I've read) is what happens at the point of collection. PII is encrypted, phone numbers (to-from), contents of communication, credit card purchases -- all encrypted (this is to say that dataset is encrypted, beyond just the HDD encryption that exists). Private keys are made up & stored for these datasets with some identifier, to get the private keys you need a warrant to get at that information (and that's not to say one private key would unlock all PII of a dataset, it could be very granular with its application)

If you want a better description of his system, watch his lecture he gave at MIT