Seaman182

If the above description about his approach to knowledge is honest, and if the show is a fair representation of the available evidence, then in theory he should never disagree with his character.

I think that he was interested in a sequel to the book, not the movie.

That's what I'd love to know, at any rate; that shit was decidedly cash.

"Several games" isn't the same as "all games." Also, a mishandled game can still be good.

As a sort of slightly moderately almost experienced skier, I can tell you that there is more or less no situation in which pizza slicing is completely necessary, or even the most efficient way to slow down. When you're new, though, I guess it can save you from some situations.

If we assume that the egg in question is a chicken egg (which we must if we're ruling out the "reptile response"), then the question becomes one of semantics surrounding the phrase "chicken egg:"

Is it an egg laid by a chicken, or is it an egg containing a chicken?

Both of these options seem logically coherent given the way in which we treat and think about eggs; they are both objects and living beings.

For there to be a chicken egg by the first definition, at least one chicken must have come before it, meaning that the chicken came first. The second definition, however, makes it clear that the first chicken would come from a chicken egg, meaning that the egg came first (this was more or less your answer).