helixine

They called uninformed "parachute journalism" a threat, since it spreads shallow views easily effected by who you happen to talk to.

Thats what happens when you take tips on who to talk to from people like AngryForeigner.

Yes, because he was the one doing it. We had Joey Salads here as well, but he didnt get as much attention.

edit

Its funny, Joey Salads clips were less misleading, since he did not voice as many far right conspiracies. He was just paranoid.

Most in here are from the_donald, they will not allow you to ask that :)

How is it neutral and objective when you started by following almost only Swedish far right, right wing populists and conspiracy theorists on twitter? The ones that found this to be "unbiased" on twitter seem to have been pretty much only people that also retweets Infowars.

How is repeating the right wing populists myths "not allowed to talk about immigration" ""Sweden has social justice censorship" and and similar conspiracy theorists anything like "close to the middle"?

You decided that its a "left vs right" thing early on, and anyone that dont follow the the narrative of "social justice censorship in Sweden" is just "the left". But since its not something the normal right wing and conservatives believe, is it then "the middle" when even conservatives are pushed into "the left" for this worldview is to work?