Games studies has perhaps moved from early ludology/structural/definitional approaches to more "games-in-context" approaches that are more about the sociological/humanistic/market contexts in which they sit.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this gross generalization, and do you see areas in the more structural/definitional areas that may yet bear fruit?
And as a followup, where do you think "games studies" as a discipline is headed?
peanutbutterfranklin1 karma
Games studies has perhaps moved from early ludology/structural/definitional approaches to more "games-in-context" approaches that are more about the sociological/humanistic/market contexts in which they sit.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this gross generalization, and do you see areas in the more structural/definitional areas that may yet bear fruit?
And as a followup, where do you think "games studies" as a discipline is headed?
View HistoryShare Link