Highest Rated Comments


thatmitchkid79 karma

If only things were so clean.

Check out Kelo vs. New London, the left side of the bench said it was perfectly fine for a town to forcefully sell people's homes so the town could then sell the land to a private company that wanted a hotel there. Scalia, Thomas, Rehnquist, & O'Connor said that's an improper use of eminent domain. I'm OK with taking land for the public good, but not when that standard amounts to "he will give me more tax revenue than you."

thatmitchkid40 karma

At which point, you're still doing exactly what the Supreme Court told them they couldn't & you're still doing it in US territory.

thatmitchkid16 karma

Universal Basic Income

thatmitchkid11 karma

Your hackery is showing, she got a book deal, then heard cases from that publisher. This is exactly the same as the other 2.

Why in God’s name do you people have to Team Sports fucking everything?

thatmitchkid7 karma

This may be in the article, I apologize if so. I haven’t gotten a chance to read it yet.

What justification do the medical boards give for allowing the doctors to continue practicing? I assume a piece of it is that revoking the right to practice medicine hinders the doctor’s ability to earn a living?

Also, how do medical boards normally handle doctors convicted of crimes in their personal lives? For example, what happens if a doctor gets convicted of domestic abuse?

Thank you!