-ScottStedman-
Highest Rated Comments
-ScottStedman-421 karma
This is a DAMN GOOD question. I actually sat here for a couple minutes thinking. It would be Joel Zamel of Psy Group and I would ask him if he or any of his companies did any work to support the Trump campaign in 2016.
-ScottStedman-308 karma
God I wish. Important content should never ever ever be behind a hard paywall. I think the future is independent journalism with verification and contributions from everyday people who find the work interesting. That's essentially what Logos is doing. https://logosnews.tech/
-ScottStedman-292 karma
The presence of financial crime EVERYTWHERE. Russia, Cyprus, US, UK, Ireland, Belize, Seychelles. Anywhere in the world.
-ScottStedman-260 karma
From my book:
I like to think of the normal blue-collar American worker who
comes home from a hard day at work and turns on the news to see
what has gone on in the world. What he or she finds on TV, however,
is anything but the news. It’s likely some Democrat yelling at a group
of Republicans or vice-versa, with personal insults flying and a painful
dearth of truth.
This attitude can also be widely found on social media, which has
increasingly become infected with purposeful disinformation by foreign
countries, bots, and trolls. These actors have no interest in sharing
fact-based reporting, but rather feed off of the chaos and discord
that comes from a hyperpartisan American population.
There is certainly a place for partisanship in the United States,
though not in the world of investigative journalism. Disagreeing over
politics and even slinging some mud is as American as apple pie. When
there is no separation between these debates and fact-finding investigations,
however, is when we as a population suffer the consequences.
-ScottStedman-927 karma
Yes. My preface to the book is about exactly just this. My big message with writing this book is that journalists HAVE to go back to relying on tangible evidence that they can print and show readers (Journalism with Proof in the book). Be more transparent. I understand the need for anonymous sources but where is the true investigative journalism? It's scant.
View HistoryShare Link