Dev_on

I'm not really part of this, but please don't confuse disagreement with harassment.

Theres enough people on bullhorns doing that already

youre welcome. I'm not going to be kind to you for what I'm reading though. and the comment was directed towards you. Attention-whore is about as bad as it came in here reading, and it's a pretty specific critique, not harassment

to read through this (came here from bestof) it really does look like someone who isn't doing due diligence, and that you wern't expecting to walk into a technically savvy croud. I think had you done some better research, it would have had better results.

That and theres many examples of people calling disagreement 'harassment' and by throwing it out flippantly like you are, I don't think you're doing your AMA any favours.

slow down chief. I'm not here to fight.

I'm just pointing out reading this thing that you don't give the impression that you've done proper due diligence. Or at the very least aren't confident enough about it to shut down even the rudimentary critique on here. theres a bunch of tech savvy sysadmins here, they aren't going to be swayed without some hard knowledge.

I'm just saying you should have done more research into your allegations... no one here has an issue with anything other than your 'investigation'

I get the impression there are two different conversations going on. Granted, this is better than woody harrelsons AMA, but it's in need of polish

I preferred Mr. Harrelsons