IDdigital
Highest Rated Comments
IDdigital27 karma
This is the ultimate question. I’m leaning one way myself, but we just don’t have all of the evidence available to us. We presented what we knew. The prosecution now claims to have more evidence than a birth certificate to prove that Natalia was born in 2003 to Anna Gava.
IDdigital26 karma
That's a great question. I did notice that and am getting some answers. The interview with the 14-year-old was in Feb. 2021. The photo of the two six-year-olds was in 2010, I believe, or early 2011. So, it doesn't seem to add up, does it?
IDdigital16 karma
Prosecutors believed their investigation established that Natalia was actually a child, despite the re-ageing, so they filed child neglect charges as well as neglect of a dependent person. The judge threw out the charges based on Natalia being a child because of the re-ageing. He wasn't going to relitigate the issue.
IDdigital15 karma
Looking at Natalia's photos and videos over the years, it seems pretty clear that she has aged.
From the time I was 13, I wanted to be a lawyer. My personal life, growing up in a small town with a lot of chaos around me, influenced my career choice. I gravitated to the structure of law-- and it framed the rest of my life.
IDdigital60 karma
Two children does not equal one adult so there would be two times the number of criminal charges! :)
View HistoryShare Link