MrBushido2318

Looking at a list of work banned by the BBFC, I don't really get what what there is to protest. I don't agree with censorship, but at the same time it doesn't sound like they're abusing their authority. The majority of things on the list are excessively violent pornos, gore porn, titles that promote the exploitation of the vulnerable (more porn/bum fights), and a few titles relating to the idolization of genuine social problems in the UK (E.g. Hooligans. Soccer riots were a huge problem for decades).

In a perfect world I don't think there's any place for censorship, but I appreciate that in reality there have to be limits to what can be considered acceptable. The question then is where do you draw the line? Real Snuff movies? Fake Snuff movies that are too realistic? Fake Snuff movies in general? I'm fairly sure whatever line has been decided was done so after careful analysis of what impact such videos have on people psychologically, and not some arbitrary decision made by a bunch of prudes.

Ultimately, though I don't think this has anything to do with actually rebelling against censorship. It's about some artsy cunt trying to get 5 minutes of fame by being a rebel. Well, congratulations mate. You spent part of your life literally watching paint dry yourself.

An evil genius has kidnapped your family and they are hanging above a pool of laser sharks, ready to be dropped at the whim of aforementioned evil genius. The only way to save them is to do one of the following, which do you choose and why?

• Write an MMORPG in Visual Basic
• Make an FPS involving Zombies
• Create a openworld sandbox building game where everything is made of cubes
• Work under the management of EA
• Profess your approval of zynga game design

It's a dark matter.