Trisa133

still better odds than winning the lottery.

Probably 2016

we make people choose a specific reason why they think there is a problem with an article

How does this ensure accuracy rather than bias? Can you explain further?

In addition, if a person it constantly reviewing certain types of articles as good or bad, that will eventually be reflected in their user rating.

Can you elaborate on this? I say this because due how reddit, search engines, etc... work, you're going to end up reading the types of articles you read. How would you rate people?

Edit: ok, I’ve read a lot of your comments and you are still dodging the question everyone is asking. I guess it is because you don’t have an answer for it. Until you are telling us your formula on how you are determining a legit objective article over another, I don’t see why anyone should have this extension. It looks like another platform to collect data from us. Good luck from now on.

Well if it makes you feel better, we do have defensive measures against ICBMs. It just has shitty success rate that's worse than Shaq's free throws.

Even if he only answered one question, I'd still take that chance. I only have to wait a day for this instead of waiting a lifetime for that damn lightning strike.