Highest Rated Comments
natha10524 karma
Because the immigration process is supposed to evaluate whether a person would be a benefit or detriment to the USA and if they would be a benefit we let them immigrate. You can bypass that process with birthright citizenship which seems like a pretty big bad thing.
natha10516 karma
I would like to dispense with the legal questions. I agree the constitution prohibits this. I agree trump lacks the authority to do this. Instead of focusing on questions of law, lets instead talk about "should". Why should someone be a citizen based on place of birth? Does this not create an incentive to cross the border to give birth? Does this not create families where a young child is a citizen with the right to stay and the parents are non-citizens in the country illegally and subject to deportation? Given the current horrific state of immigration law, what are the policy reasons for this policy continuing?
natha1057 karma
I just wanted to say thanks for doing this (both the AMA and the platform). Reddit is a tough audience to try and sell the upsides of Lobbying to because I think it has largely bought into the notion that the government is corrupt and it was the lobbyists who corrupted it. As you know, changing a group's perceptions can be almost impossible to do. I've always found lobbying fascinating so let me ask you my question:
What's your best war story? The time you were most proud of getting an idea to click with a lawmaker.
natha10596 karma
I have three questions:
View HistoryShare Link