weezuls

Why does Chomsky call you a charlatan? Does he think you made up linguistic data?

Right: Everett is talking about language for numbers, not number independent of language

The Piraha have no words for numbers, not even 1

See Frank, Everett, Fedorenko & Gibson (2008), Cognition.

What Everett means is that they have no words for exact numbers, not even one.

But they do have the concepts of 1, 2, 3, like non-human animals. they just don't have words for these concepts because their culture doesn't make it useful to talk about such concepts.

See Frank, Everett, Fedorenko & Gibson (2008), Cognition.

that's a mistake: like all humans and non-human animals, they have concepts for small exact numbers and approximate numbers

I am a researcher in this area, and I know the Piraha discussion well. The paper by Frank et al makes the position clear (where Everett is an author)

​

Edit: apparently, Everett may have a different definition of "concept" than what what cognitive scientists use.